Choosing the right developer platform matters. Here's how GitHat compares to NextAuth.js across auth, database, compute, hosting, and AI agent identity.
| Feature | GitHat | NextAuth.js |
|---|---|---|
| Managed service (no self-hosting) | ✓ GitHat | ✗ |
| Pre-built UI components | ✓ GitHat | ✗ |
| Multi-org support | ✓ GitHat | ✗ |
| CLI scaffolder | ✓ GitHat | ✗ |
| MCP/agent auth | ✓ GitHat | ✗ |
| No database setup | ✓ GitHat | ✗ |
| Next.js support | ✓ | ✓ |
| JWT tokens | ✓ | ✓ |
| TypeScript | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open-source friendly | ✓ | ✓ |
| Fully self-hosted | ✗ | ✓ |
| No vendor lock-in | ✗ | ✓ |
| Custom provider flexibility | ✗ | ✓ |
| Database adapter system | ✗ | ✓ |
If you need auth, database, hosting, MCP server verification, or AI agent authentication from one platform quickly, GitHat is the better choice. NextAuth.js is a strong option if you need fully self-hosted.
Start building with GitHatFree to get started. No credit card required.